Commentaries

June 30, 2026

July 27, 2026

June 30, 2026

The Sound Shore Fund Investor Class (SSHFX) and Institutional Class (SSHVX) advanced 10.48% and 10.58%, respectively, in the second quarter of 2026, trailing the Russell 1000 Value Index (Russell Value) which advanced 13.87%, and the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index (S&P 500) which advanced 15.20%.  The three-year annualized gains for SSHFX of 19.41% and for SSHVX of 19.66% were ahead of the Russell Value’s 17.79% and behind the S&P 500’s 20.61%.  As long-term investors, we highlight that Sound Shore’s 35-year annualized returns of 10.67% and 10.93%, for SSHFX and SSHVX, respectively, as of June 30, 2026, were ahead of the Russell Value at 10.46% and trailed the S&P 500 at 11.11%.  For the Fund's most recent standardized performance information, click here.

Performance data quoted represents past performance and is no guarantee of future results. Current performance may be lower or higher than the performance data quoted. Investment return and principal value will fluctuate so that an investor’s shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than their original cost.

Stocks staged a powerful comeback in the second quarter of 2026, with the S&P 500 rallying 15.2% to mark its strongest quarterly gain since 2020.  Propelled by a resurgence in the artificial intelligence (AI) trade, semiconductor, hardware, and memory chip makers saw triple-digit surges driven by massive data center infrastructure spending.  Investor sentiment was further bolstered by a tentative ceasefire in the Iran war and the ensuing decline in oil prices, which eased inflationary fears.  Combined with resilient corporate earnings and a stable U.S. labor market, equities shrugged off higher Treasury yields and hawkish comments from the new Federal Reserve Chair, Kevin Warsh.  The concentration of returns within the S&P 500 has received a lot of attention lately, but notably, it wasn’t just the growth-oriented S&P that benefited from AI.  A very narrow band of companies drove performance within the Russell Value as well.  Information technology (IT) contributed 9.4 percentage points of the Russell Value’s 13.8% second quarter return, with just two names—Micron Technology and Intel—accounting for 4.3 percentage points of that total.

Sound Shore’s portfolio also benefited from the AI wave in the second quarter.  Sound Shore has always had exposure to IT (approximately 15% weight during Q2), but our value discipline will steer us away from the most expensive parts of the market.  Qualcomm and Marvell Technology, were two of our strongest contributors in 2Q.  Both are excellent case studies, which we profiled in our first quarter letter as businesses marrying secular technology tailwinds with compelling valuations.  A leading semiconductor supplier, Qualcomm (QCOM) is rapidly diversifying its business; its developer tools are accelerating edge AI functionality in new markets, driving demand for QCOM chips.  We believe Qualcomm possesses the strategic flexibility required to capture the immense AI opportunity ahead.  Notably, we believe Qualcomm is trading for an attractive 10 times earnings power once the new business kicks in.  Meanwhile, Marvell Technology benefited from its data center exposure which stems from the company’s dominant networking and optical business and is now expanding into custom silicon (ASIC) tailored chips for hyperscalers.  The trick from here remains how long will the cycle last and how much exposure is appropriate, given the unprecedented move in this part of the market.  More on that later.

Importantly, we had more breadth in our return than the indices.  Away from tech, health benefits leader Elevance Health was a strong contributor.  Elevance offers network-based managed care plans to large and small employer, individual, Medicaid, and Medicare markets.  We identified the stock after it had sold off on investor concerns over regulatory risk and weak margins in its Medicaid and Medicare businesses.  Trading below normal at 13 times earnings with double digit earnings growth, we feel the market is underestimating the strength of the franchise.  Management is focused on improving margins in the near term and the company consistently returns capital to shareholders via stock repurchases and dividends.  Of note, CEO Gail Boudreaux has highlighted that internal artificial intelligence tools have slashed prior authorization denials by nearly 70% and optimized payment integrity.  This translates directly into lower administrative overhead and expanding operating margins, proving that the productivity benefits of AI are reverberating far beyond the technology sector itself.

Leading airline Southwest Air was also a meaningful contributor this quarter.  Having weathered a difficult industry environment over the last 5 years, management is implementing a number of changes to boost margins, including premium services like increased legroom, preferred seating, and charging for checked bags.  These initiatives allow Southwest to better price its product and restore returns to historical standards.  With an estimated earnings power of $6 or more per share, we believe this investment maintains a compelling position in the portfolio.

Detractors for the period included some of our energy names which gave back a portion of their YTD gains as they retreated with energy prices.  Our energy holdings have low-cost operations and strong balance sheets to better manage the volatile nature of the industry.  Similarly, biopharmaceutical company Regeneron returned a portion of its earlier advance after announcing mixed clinical trial results for its melanoma drug.  We initiated our position when the stock was trading at a very attractive 13 times earnings with an 8% free cash flow yield.  The company has a fortress balance sheet and a number of pipeline drugs that show great promise that we don’t think we are paying for at this valuation.

The artificial intelligence revolution we are witnessing is rippling through the economy in distinct technological waves, with each phase triggering an enormous capital expenditure cycle for the next.  The initial wave concentrated heavily on raw compute power, cementing Nvidia’s dominance in GPU technology alongside specialized CPU and ASIC developers.  However, as hyperscalers race to build data centers to house this compute, the wave has rapidly expanded into the physical world.  This has sparked unprecedented demand for electrical equipment manufacturers to provide grid hardware, and forced power companies to secure the electrical capacity required to keep these facilities running.  Ultimately, this surging infrastructure groundswell backflows into the hardware layer, driving a secondary wave of demand for advanced memory chips to prevent data bottlenecks and keep pace with accelerating processing speeds. There are certainly parts of this surge of investment that will be cyclical and many participants are beginning to ponder when/if that occurs.  As always, we remain vigilant in our process – refusing to chase the latest momentum.  Instead, we focus on investing in companies with enduring business models and better earnings power that is not reflected in today’s stock price.

With 48 years of experience and having been through numerous market cycles, our contrarian approach remains focused on uncovering attractively valued companies with internally driven earnings that can propel value for years to come.  Our long-term investment process looks forward to assess where a company’s normal earning power will be.  This leads us to stocks with management teams employing strategies that are durable and have sustainable businesses we want to partner with in our portfolio.  The ability to have a long-term view and manage through these cycles is increasingly rare, but will likely determine our success.

Currently, our portfolio is attractively valued at an average twelve-month forward P/E ratio of 13 times versus the S&P 500 of 20 times and the Russell Value of 17 times.  We appreciate your investment alongside ours and encourage you to reach out with any questions or comments.

Important Information

An investment in the Fund is subject to risk, including the possible loss of principal amount invested. Mid Cap Risk: Securities of medium sized companies may be more volatile and more difficult to liquidate during market downturns than securities of large, more widely traded companies. Foreign Securities Risk: The Fund may invest in foreign securities primarily in the form of American Depositary Receipts. Investing in the securities of foreign issuers also involves certain special risks, which are not typically associated with investing in U.S. dollar-denominated securities or quoted securities of U.S. issuers including increased risks of adverse issuer, political, regulatory, market or economic developments, changes in currency rates and in exchange control regulations. The Fund is also subject to other risks, including, but not limited to, risks associated with value investing.

The Adviser analyzes risk on a company-by-company basis. The Adviser considers governance as well as environmental and social factors (ESG) as appropriate. While valuation, governance, environmental and social factors are analyzed, the evaluation of all key investment considerations is industry- and company-specific. Consequently, no one issue necessarily disqualifies a company from investment and no individual characteristic must be present prior to investment.

The views in this letter were those of the Fund managers as of 6/30/26 and may not necessarily reflect their views on the date this letter is first published or anytime thereafter.

This commentary may contain discussions about certain investments both held and not held in the portfolio. Current and future portfolio holdings are subject to risk. For the Fund’s Top 10 Holdings click here.

You should consider the Fund’s investment objective, risks, charges and expenses carefully before investing. The summary prospectus and/or the prospectus contain this and other information about the Fund and are available from your financial intermediary or www.soundshorefund.com. The summary prospectus and/or prospectus should be read carefully before investing.

Distributed by Foreside Fund Services, LLC.

March 31, 2026

The Sound Shore Fund Investor Class (SSHFX) and Institutional Class (SSHVX) declined 3.45% and 3.43%, respectively, in the first quarter of 2026, trailing the Russell 1000 Value Index (Russell Value) which advanced 2.10%, and ahead of the Standard & Poor's 500 Index (S&P 500) which declined 4.33%.  The three year annualized gains for SSHFX of 17.45% and for SSHVX of 17.68% were ahead of the Russell Value's 14.31% and behind the S&P 500's 18.32%.  As long-term investors, we highlight that Sound Shore's 35 year annualized returns of 10.43% and 10.69%, for SSHFX and SSHVX, respectively, as of March 31, 2026,...

December 31, 2025

The Sound Shore Fund Investor Class (SSHFX) and Institutional Class (SSHVX) advanced 7.83% and 7.87%, respectively, in the fourth quarter of 2025, substantially ahead of the Standard & Poor's 500 Index (S&P 500) which advanced 2.66% and the Russell 1000 Value Index (Russell Value) which advanced 3.81%.  It was a strong year for Sound Shore's portfolio, with SSHFX gaining 18.20% and SSHVX rising 18.42% in 2025, also ahead of the S&P 500's return of 17.88% and the Russell Value's return of 15.91%.  As of December 31, 2025, the three year annualized advances for SSHFX of 19.38% and for SSHVX of...

September 30, 2025

The Sound Shore Fund Investor Class (SSHFX) and Institutional Class (SSHVX) advanced 8.46% and 8.53%, respectively, in the third quarter of 2025, well ahead of the Russell 1000 Value Index (Russell Value) which advanced 5.33%, and ahead of the Standard & Poor's 500 Index (S&P 500) which advanced 8.12%.  The three year annualized advances for SSHFX of 21.32% and for SSHVX of 21.57% were ahead of the Russell Value's 16.96% and behind the S&P 500's 24.94%.  As long-term investors, we highlight that Sound Shore's 35 year annualized returns of 10.87% and 11.14%, for SSHFX and SSHVX, respectively, as of September...

June 30, 2025

The Sound Shore Fund Investor Class (SSHFX) and Institutional Class (SSHVX) advanced 3.06% and 3.10%, respectively, in the second quarter of 2025, trailing the Russell 1000 Value Index (Russell Value) which advanced 3.79%, and the Standard & Poor's 500 Index (S&P 500) which advanced 10.94%.  The three year annualized advances for SSHFX of 14.92% and for SSHVX of 15.14% were ahead of the Russell Value's 12.76% and behind the S&P 500's 19.71%.  As long-term investors, we highlight that Sound Shore's 35 year annualized returns of 10.09% and 10.37%, for SSHFX and SSHVX, respectively, as of June 30, 2025, were ahead...

March 31, 2025

The Sound Shore Fund Investor Class (SSHFX) and Institutional Class (SSHVX) declined 1.93% and 1.89%, respectively, in the first quarter of 2025, trailing the Russell 1000 Value Index (Russell Value) which advanced 2.14%, and ahead of the Standard & Poor's 500 Index (S&P 500) which declined 4.27%.  The three year annualized advances for SSHFX of 8.43% and for SSHVX of 8.64% were ahead of the Russell Value's 6.64% and behind the S&P 500's 9.06%.  As long-term investors, we highlight that Sound Shore's 35 year annualized returns of 10.13% and 10.41%, for SSHFX and SSHVX, respectively, as of March 31, 2025,...

March 31, 2026

April 28, 2026

Signs of Life

March 31, 2026

December 31, 2025

January 27, 2026

Finding Value in Today’s Market

January 26, 2026

How to Find Undervalued Stocks

November 26, 2025

September 30, 2025

October 24, 2025

The Evolution of Value Investing

August 21, 2025

Portfolio Update

August 4, 2025

LOW VALUATION, HIGH UPSIDE: CAPITAL ONE, PAYPAL, DISNEY, TEVA

July 31, 2025

June 30, 2025

July 21, 2025

March 31, 2025

April 29, 2025

December 31, 2024

January 29, 2025

QUARTERLY INSIGHTS: IDENTIFYING VALUE UNDER THE HOOD

November 1, 2024

September 30, 2024

October 25, 2024

June 30, 2024

July 22, 2024

MEET THE SOUND SHORE MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT TEAM

June 14, 2024

VALUE MANAGERS MAKE THE CASE FOR UNDERVALUED STOCKS

May 11, 2024

SOUND SHORE MANAGEMENT NAMES DAVID BILIK & PETER EVANS PORTFOLIO MANAGERS AND ANNOUNCES LEADERSHIP TRANSITION

May 2, 2024

March 31, 2024

April 25, 2024

December 31, 2023

January 24, 2024

QUARTERLY INSIGHTS: HOW SOUND SHORE IS UNCOVERING VALUE IN TODAY’S MARKET

December 18, 2023

JOHN DEGULIS ON BUSINESS BREAKDOWNS PODCAST

November 29, 2023

September 30, 2023

October 24, 2023

Value Equities Time To Fly

September 10, 2023

June 30, 2023

July 27, 2023

March 31, 2023

April 27, 2023

December 31, 2022

January 31, 2023

September 30, 2022

September 30, 2022

Large-Cap Value Investors Tout 3 Cheap Stocks

September 5, 2022

June 30, 2022

June 30, 2022

March 31, 2022

March 31, 2022

December 31, 2021

February 4, 2022

September 30, 2021

September 30, 2021

June 30, 2021

June 30, 2021

Thermo Fisher Scientific

June 4, 2021

March 31, 2021

March 31, 2021

December 31, 2020

December 31, 2020

FA 100: CNBC Ranks the Top-Rated Financial Advisory Firms of 2020

October 6, 2020

September 30, 2020

September 30, 2020

June 30, 2020

June 30, 2020

March 31, 2020

March 31, 2020

December 31, 2019

December 31, 2019

FA 100: CNBC Ranks the Top-Rated Financial Advisory Firms of 2019

October 10, 2019

September 30, 2019

September 30, 2019

June 30, 2019

June 30, 2019

Constructing Portfolios That Differ From The Index

June 3, 2019

March 31, 2019

March 31, 2019

December 31, 2018

December 31, 2018

The Money 50

February 1, 2018